Jump to content

The Steele dossier proved Trump colluded with Russia

From bullshitopedia
The Steele dossier proved Trump colluded with Russia
UNSUPPORTED
"A dossier compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele in 2016 proved that Donald Trump's campaign conspired with the Russian government and that Russia held compromising material on Trump."
Domain Politics & Elections
Tactic Statistical & Evidentiary Distortion
False Context
Era Current
First seen 2017
Origin Opposition research memos written in 2016 for the firm Fusion GPS, funded through a law firm by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, published in full by BuzzFeed News on January 10, 2017
Last reviewed 2026-10-27
Further reading: books on Politics & Elections

The claim that the Steele dossier proved Trump colluded with Russia was promoted by some commentators and politicians after BuzzFeed News published the dossier in January 2017. The dossier, a series of memos by former MI6 officer Christopher Steele based on information from unnamed sources, alleged that the Trump campaign coordinated with the Russian government and that Russia had compromising material on Trump, including an alleged sex tape. Later investigations did not corroborate its most sensational allegations, and some were contradicted. Special counsel Robert Mueller did not establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, and a Justice Department inspector general found serious problems with how the FBI used the dossier. Some of its broad themes, such as Russia's preference for Trump and its interference in the election, were consistent with other evidence.

The claim

The dossier alleged, among other things, that Russia had been cultivating Trump for years, that the campaign and Russian officials had a "well-developed conspiracy of co-operation," that Trump lawyer Michael Cohen had traveled to Prague to meet Russian operatives, and that Russian intelligence had compromising recordings of Trump. After its publication, some commentators treated it as largely confirmed.

Origin

In 2016 the research firm Fusion GPS was hired by the law firm Perkins Coie, which represented the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, to research Trump. Fusion hired Steele, who had run the Russia desk at MI6. Steele shared his memos with the FBI. BuzzFeed published them in January 2017 with a note that the allegations were unverified and contained errors.

What the evidence shows

  • Mueller. The 2019 Mueller report documented extensive Russian interference and numerous contacts between Trump associates and Russian-linked individuals, but did not establish that the campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government. It found that Cohen had not traveled to Prague, contradicting a specific dossier claim.
  • Inspector General. A December 2019 report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz found that the FBI had relied substantially on the dossier to obtain surveillance warrants on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, and identified 17 significant errors and omissions in the applications. It reported that Steele's primary source had told the FBI in early 2017 that some of the information was rumor and speculation and had been conveyed with more certainty than warranted.
  • The primary source. Steele's main source, Igor Danchenko, was charged by special counsel John Durham with lying to the FBI and was acquitted by a jury in 2022. Durham's 2023 report sharply criticized the FBI's handling of the investigation.
  • Uncorroborated allegations. The alleged compromising tape has never been substantiated.
  • Broader context. The US intelligence community and the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Russia interfered in 2016 to help Trump, a point consistent with the dossier's general theme, though reached through independent evidence.

Why it persists

The dossier was treated by many of Trump's opponents as confirmation of their suspicions, and by many of his supporters as proof that investigations of him were illegitimate. Both sides tended to overstate what it showed. Its story illustrates how unverified opposition research can enter public debate through intelligence agencies and the media, and how investigators can rely too heavily on material that fits their expectations.

Lessons for readers

  • Treat unverified intelligence and opposition research as leads, not evidence.
  • Ask who commissioned a report and for what purpose.
  • Distinguish between broad themes that may be accurate and specific allegations that are unproven.
  • Check whether specific claims have been corroborated by later investigations.
  • Overstating evidence can backfire, damaging legitimate inquiries.

See also

Sources

  • Robert S. Mueller III, Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election (2019).
  • US Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation (December 2019).
  • John H. Durham, Report on Matters Related to Intelligence Activities and Investigations Arising Out of the 2016 Presidential Campaigns (May 2023).
  • Ken Bensinger, Miriam Elder and Mark Schoofs, "These Reports Allege Trump Has Deep Ties To Russia," BuzzFeed News, January 10, 2017.
Retrieved from "https://bullshitopedia.org/index.php?title=The_Steele_dossier_proved_Trump_colluded_with_Russia&oldid=507"