Jump to content

The Killian documents on George W. Bush's National Guard service

From bullshitopedia
The Killian documents on George W. Bush's National Guard service
UNSUPPORTED
"Memos written in 1972 and 1973 by Lieutenant Colonel Jerry Killian, George W. Bush's commander in the Texas Air National Guard, show that Bush failed to meet Guard standards and that superiors were pressured to "sugarcoat" his record."
Domain Politics & Elections
Tactic Fabrication
Imposture
Era Current
First seen 2004
Origin A 60 Minutes Wednesday report on CBS News, presented by Dan Rather, on September 8, 2004, less than two months before the presidential election
Last reviewed 2026-10-27
Further reading: books on Politics & Elections

The Killian documents were four memos broadcast by CBS News on September 8, 2004, in a report questioning President George W. Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard during the Vietnam War. They were presented as personal records written by Bush's late commander, Lieutenant Colonel Jerry Killian. Within hours, document experts and bloggers raised doubts about their authenticity, noting that their typography looked like modern word-processor output. CBS could not authenticate them, the source admitted misleading the network about how he obtained them, and an independent panel later sharply criticized CBS's reporting. The network said it could no longer vouch for the documents. The episode ended the careers of several CBS journalists and executives and overshadowed legitimate questions about Bush's Guard record.

The claim

The memos suggested that Bush had failed to take a required physical exam, that he had been suspended from flight status, and that a superior officer was pressing Killian to "sugarcoat" Bush's evaluations. The report, produced by Mary Mapes and presented by anchor Dan Rather, was presented as new evidence that Bush received favorable treatment.

What the evidence shows

  • Typographical questions. Within hours of the broadcast, posters on conservative websites and blogs noted features such as proportional spacing, a superscript "th" and a font resembling Times New Roman. Some showed that the memos could be closely reproduced using default settings in Microsoft Word. Defenders argued that some typewriters of the era could produce similar effects, and experts disagreed on details.
  • No originals. CBS had only photocopies, and the experts it consulted before broadcast had not authenticated them; some later said they had raised concerns.
  • Killian's family and colleagues. Killian had died in 1984. His widow and son said he did not keep such files, and his former secretary said the memos were not authentic, although she said they reflected sentiments she believed he held.
  • The source. The documents came from Bill Burkett, a retired Texas Guard officer and critic of Bush. He later admitted he had misled CBS about where he obtained them.
  • CBS retraction. On September 20, 2004, CBS said it could no longer vouch for the documents' authenticity and that it should not have used them. Rather apologized on air.
  • Independent panel. A panel led by former Attorney General Dick Thornburgh and former Associated Press president Louis Boccardi reported in January 2005 that CBS had failed to follow basic journalistic standards, citing a "myopic zeal" to break the story. The panel said it could not determine conclusively whether the documents were forgeries but found that CBS had failed to authenticate them. CBS fired Mapes and asked three executives to resign. Rather left the anchor chair in March 2005.

The underlying questions

Questions about Bush's Guard service, including gaps in his records and whether family connections helped him enter the Guard, were raised by other journalists before and after the CBS report and were based on genuine documents. The collapse of the Killian memos made it harder to discuss these questions, an example of how a flawed exposé can discredit a legitimate line of inquiry.

Why it persists

The case became a landmark in the relationship between traditional media and online fact-checkers, showing that bloggers could rapidly scrutinize and challenge major news organizations. It is also a warning about confirmation bias in journalism: reporters who believe a story is true may fail to check evidence that confirms it.

Lessons for readers

  • Documents presented as evidence should be authenticated, ideally from originals.
  • Ask where a document came from and whether the source has a motive.
  • Confirmation bias affects journalists as much as anyone.
  • A discredited piece of evidence does not settle the underlying question either way.
  • Crowd-sourced scrutiny can quickly expose problems, though it can also be wrong.

See also

Sources

  • Dick Thornburgh and Louis D. Boccardi, Report of the Independent Review Panel on the September 8, 2004 60 Minutes Wednesday Segment "For the Record" Concerning President Bush's Texas Air National Guard Service (January 2005).
  • CBS News, statement on the Killian documents, September 20, 2004.
  • Mary Mapes, Truth and Duty: The Press, the President, and the Privilege of Power (St. Martin's Press, 2005).