Jump to content

Wells Fargo customers wanted their extra accounts

From bullshitopedia
Wells Fargo customers wanted their extra accounts
FALSE
"Wells Fargo's industry-leading rate of selling multiple products to each customer reflected strong customer demand and deep customer relationships."
Domain Business, Finance & Scams
Tactic Fraud or Scam
Statistical & Evidentiary Distortion
Era Current
First seen 2000s
Origin Wells Fargo's reporting of its "cross-selling" ratio to investors, and its sales practices in community banking from at least 2002
Last reviewed 2026-10-26
Further reading: books on Business, Finance & Scams

The claim that Wells Fargo customers wanted their extra accounts underpinned the bank's reputation for years as a leader in "cross-selling," selling many products to each customer. Wells Fargo regularly told investors that its customers held an average of about six products each and set a goal of eight, captured in the internal slogan "Eight is great." In 2016 regulators revealed that employees under intense sales pressure had opened as many as 1.5 million bank accounts and more than 500,000 credit card applications without customers' knowledge or consent. A later review raised the estimate of potentially unauthorized accounts to about 3.5 million. The bank paid billions of dollars in penalties, its chief executive resigned, and the scandal became a lasting example of how performance targets can drive misconduct.

The claim

Wells Fargo's community banking business promoted cross-selling as the key to its strategy and its success. The bank highlighted its cross-sell ratio, the average number of products per household, in reports to investors as evidence of strong customer relationships. Analysts praised the strategy, and Wells Fargo became one of the most valuable banks in the world.

Origin

Employees in branches faced daily and even hourly sales targets for opening accounts, credit cards and other products. Managers monitored performance closely, and employees who missed quotas were criticized, denied advancement or fired. Many employees reported that the targets were unrealistic.

To meet them, some employees opened accounts customers had not requested, moved money from customers' existing accounts into new ones, created fake email addresses to enroll customers in online banking, and issued debit and credit cards without authorization. Some customers paid fees or suffered damage to their credit scores as a result. Practices of this kind were reported internally and in the press for years before regulators acted. In 2013 the Los Angeles Times published an investigation describing pressure on employees and unauthorized accounts.

What the evidence shows

In September 2016 the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Los Angeles City Attorney announced settlements with Wells Fargo totaling $185 million. They said an analysis commissioned by the bank had found that employees may have opened about 1.5 million deposit accounts and submitted about 565,000 credit card applications without consent between 2011 and 2015. Wells Fargo said it had fired about 5,300 employees over several years for improper sales practices.

Critics noted that the bank had punished low-level employees while senior executives who set the targets were rewarded. Chief executive John Stumpf was questioned sharply by members of the US Senate and House and resigned in October 2016. The head of community banking, Carrie Tolstedt, had retired earlier with a large payout.

A 2017 investigation commissioned by the bank's independent directors concluded that the sales model had created intense pressure and that senior leaders had failed to respond to warning signs. An expanded review that year raised the estimate of potentially unauthorized accounts to about 3.5 million. Further problems emerged, including customers charged for auto insurance they did not need.

In 2018 the Federal Reserve took the unusual step of limiting Wells Fargo's asset growth until it improved its governance and controls. In 2020 the bank agreed to pay $3 billion to settle criminal and civil investigations by the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission, which said the bank had misled investors about its cross-selling success. The OCC later banned Stumpf from the banking industry and fined him $17.5 million. Tolstedt pleaded guilty in 2023 to obstructing a bank examination. The Federal Reserve lifted the asset cap in 2025.

Why it persists

The Wells Fargo case is studied widely in business and ethics courses because it illustrates:

  • Metrics becoming targets. When a measure, such as products per customer, becomes a target, people find ways to hit it that defeat its purpose. This is often described as Goodhart's law.
  • Pressure flowing downhill. Unrealistic targets set at the top produced misconduct at the bottom.
  • Misleading investors. The cross-sell ratio was presented as evidence of customer loyalty when part of it reflected fraud.
  • Delayed accountability. Senior leaders were held responsible years after problems were first reported.

Lessons for readers

  • Check your accounts and credit reports regularly for products you did not request.
  • Be cautious about performance metrics that a company promotes as proof of success; ask how they are achieved.
  • Unrealistic targets can create incentives for fraud.
  • When front-line employees are fired for misconduct in large numbers, ask what pressures led to it.
  • Regulatory action often comes years after journalists and employees raise concerns.

See also

Sources

  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Fines Wells Fargo $100 Million for Widespread Illegal Practice of Secretly Opening Unauthorized Accounts," press release, September 8, 2016.
  • E. Scott Reckard, "Wells Fargo's pressure-cooker sales culture comes at a cost," Los Angeles Times, December 21, 2013.
  • Independent Directors of the Board of Wells Fargo & Company, Sales Practices Investigation Report (April 10, 2017).
  • US Department of Justice, "Wells Fargo Agrees to Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Criminal and Civil Investigations into Sales Practices," press release, February 21, 2020.